STATEMENT FOR POPE BENEDICT XVI
ABOUT THE PATTERN OF THE SEXUAL ABUSE CRISIS
IN THE UNITED STATES
Your Holiness, I, Richard Sipe, approach you
reluctantly to speak about the problem of sexual abuse by
priests and bishops in the United States, but I am encouraged
and prompted by the directive of Vatican II, Lumen Gentium,
Chapter IV, No. 37. “By reason of knowledge, competence…the
laity are empowered—indeed sometimes obliged—to manifest their
opinion on those things that pertain to the good of the Church.”
And also moved by your heartfelt demonstration of concern for
victims on your recent visit to the United States I bring to
your attention a dimension of the crisis not yet addressed. It
is closer to the systemic center of the problem and one most
difficult for you to address.
As the crisis of sexual abuse of our children
and vulnerable adults by priests and bishops in the United
States is unfolding the dynamics of this dysfunction are
becoming painfully clear.
This sexual aberration is not generated from the
bottom up—that is only from unsuitable candidates—but from the
top down—that is from the sexual behaviors of superiors, even
bishops and cardinals.
The problem facing us in the American church is
systemic. I will present Your Holiness with only a few examples:
Bishop Thomas Lyons, now deceased, who was an
Auxiliary in the Archdiocese of Washington D.C. groomed,
seduced, and sexually abused a boy from the time he was seven
years old until he was seventeen. When that boy grew into
manhood he in turn abused his own child and young relatives.
When I asked him about his actions he said to me, “I thought it
was natural. Father (Lyons) told me a priest showed him this
when he was growing up.” A pattern was perpetuated for at least
four generations.
Abbot John Eidenschink of St. John’s Abbey,
Collegeville, Minnesota sexually abused some of his young monks
during confession and spiritual direction. He admitted this
behavior in regard to two of the monks I interviewed. They
described the behavior in disturbingly graphic detail. Older
monks that I interviewed told me that they knew that John’s
Novice Master was inappropriately affectionate with him during
his two years as a novice. More than a dozen of the monks of
this monastery have been credibly accused of abuse of minors
while Abbot Eidenschink was promoted to President of his
Monastic Congregation, the American Cassinese.
While I was Adjunct Professor at a Pontifical
Seminary, St. Mary’s Baltimore (1972-1984) a number of
seminarians came to me with concerns about the behavior of
Theodore E. McCarrick then bishop of Metuchen New Jersey. It has
been widely known for several decades that Bishop/Archbishop now
Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick took seminarians and young
priests to a shore home in New Jersey, sites in New York, and
other places and slept with some of them. He established a
coterie of young seminarians and priests that he encouraged to
call him “Uncle Ted.” I have his correspondence where he
referred to these men as being “cousins” with each other.
Catholic journalist Matt C. Abbott already
featured the statements of two priests (2005) and one ex-priest
(2006) about McCarrick. All three were "in the know" and aware
of the Cardinal McCarrick’s activities in the same mode as I had
heard at the seminary. None of these reporters, as far as Abbott
knew, had sexual contact with the cardinal in the infamous
sleepovers, but one had first hand reports from a
seminarian/priest who did share a bed and received cards and
letters from McCarrick. The modus operendi is similar to the
documents and letters I have received from a priest who
describes in detail McCarrick’s sexual advances and personal
activity. At least one prominent journalist at the Boston Globe
was aware of McCarrick from his investigation of another priest,
but until now legal documentation has not been available. And
even at this point the complete story cannot be published
because priest reporters are afraid of reprisals.
I know the names of at least four priests who
have had sexual encounters with Cardinal McCarrick. I have
documents and letters that record the first hand testimony and
eye witness accounts of McCarrick, then archbishop of Newark,
New Jersey actually having sex with a priest, and at other times
subjecting a priest to unwanted sexual advances.
Your Holiness, you must seek out and listen to
the stories, as I have from many priests about their seduction
by highly placed clerics, and the dire consequences in their
lives that does end in their victimization alone.
Such behavior fosters confusion and makes
celibacy problematic for seminarians and priests. This abuse
paves the way for them to pass the tradition on—to have sex with
each other and even with minors.
The pattern and practice of priests in positions
of responsibility for the training of men for the
priesthood—rectors, confessors, spiritual directors, novice
masters, and other clergy—who have sexual relations with
seminarians and other priests is rampant in the Catholic Church
in the United States. I have reviewed hundreds of documents that
record just such behavior and interviewed scores of priests who
have suffered from this activity. Priests, sexually active in
the above manner have frequently been appointed by the Vatican
to be ordained bishops or even created cardinals.
I approach Your Holiness with due reverence, but
with the same intensity that motivated Peter Damian to lay out
before your predecessor, Pope Leo IX, a description of the
condition of the clergy during his time. The problems he spoke
of are similar and as great now in the United States as they
were then in Rome. If Your Holiness requests I will submit to
you personally documentation of that about which I have spoken.
Your Holiness, I submit this to you with urgent
concern for our Church, especially for the young and our clergy.