BURLINGTON
VERMONT:
PROFILE OF ONE
DIOCESE
May
30, 2009
Since the sexual abuse crisis in the
Roman Catholic Church became more public
in 2002 a number of dioceses have been
forced to make public the reports of
complaints in their files. Although
these do not provide a complete picture
of the celibate practice in any one
diocese, an analysis of the available
data can help the Catholic Church in the
United States educate and prepare
priests better for ministry and protect
them and the people they are called to
serve, especially children and the
vulnerable, from abuse.
All of the following information
comes from documentation of complaints
registered between 1950 and 2002 and
contained in the Burlington Vermont
diocesan files.
1. Sexual
Orientation: Of the 102 priests in the
Burlington Diocese whose records were
available forty-four (44) can be
determined to have a heterosexual
orientation based on accounts of their
behaviors; also from reports of
behaviors forty-nine (49) priests can be
said to have a homosexual orientation;
six (6) priests can be called bi-sexual
from accounts of their behaviors. There
was insufficient information to
determine the orientation of three (3)
priests.
2. Alcohol was
noted as an element in eighteen (18)
cases of problem behavior. Two priests
were sent to treatment specifically for
alcoholism.
3. Sex With Teens:
Twenty-nine (29) priests were involved
in sex with minors over the age of 14.
Two (2) of the priests were sexually
active with teen-aged girls,
twenty-seven (27) with teen-aged boys.
4. Sex With
Children: Twenty-three (23) priests were
sexually involved with children under
the age of 13 years. Nineteen (19)
priests were sexually in involved with
boys. Four (4) priests were sexually
involved with girls under the age of 13.
Three priests sexually abused both boys
and girls under the age of 13. On the
basis of these reports these priests can
be diagnosed as pedophiles. The youngest
child victim reported was a girl 3 years
old; the youngest boy was 5 years old.
5. Behaviors With
Minors: The types of sexual behaviors of
priests with minors are of special
concern. Many records of behaviors with
minors are vague and are listed as
foundling or “foundling +” to indicate
sexually inappropriate touch on the
skin, including masturbation, or outside
the clothing plus activities minors do
not want to specify. Sleeping with minor
boys and bathing nude with them was
frequently reported. Anal rape of
adolescent boys is noted in reports of
two priests; in addition anal
intercourse is recorded 5 times and oral
copulation is also noted 5 times in the
list of abuse of minor boys. The use of
pornography and incidents of voyeurism
were reported. At least two (2) minors
were solicited for sex during
confession. There is no report that
either incident was investigated and
processed according to church law. Of
all the offenders only two priests were
convicted of sexual crimes against
minors.
6. Sex With Adult or
Married Women: Fifteen priests (15) were
reported for involvement with married
women; twelve priests (12) had
relationships with adult women; two (2)
priests impregnated a partner, one was
17 years old; four (4) priests were
reported for sexual involvement with
housekeepers;
7. Adult Consensual
Sex: Although sexual relations between
unattached consenting adults is
ordinarily a private matter, the power
position of a Catholic priest, and the
public assurance that he is by
profession sexually safe make his sexual
activity with adults hypocritical and
questionable at the very least. Adult
consensual sex is ordinarily not
criminal, however, the circumstances
listed above create a climate vulnerable
to harassment and abuse. Many adult
women who report assault register
dissatisfaction with church authority
when they complain of mistreatment at
the hands of a priest. Regardless of the
circumstances frequently the woman in
such a liaison is branded as the seducer
and the priest is easily exonerated and
even promoted. This can prevail even
following an abortion insisted on by the
priest of a pregnancy of his child.
8. Reports named
nineteen (19) priests who had sexual
relationships with adult men. There are
instances of adult homosexual relations
of priests with men or other priests
that border on the criminal, however
rarely reported.
9. Notice: Beyond the
general notice that all Catholic Bishops
have about the sexual activity of clergy
due to their position of authority over
their priests and the personal
communications they receive because of
their office, American bishops knew
since 1947 of the work of the Servants
of the Paracletes (sP) at Via Coeli in
New Mexico to help priests with
behavioral and moral problems. At one
time the Paracletes had long-term half
way houses in Minnesota and a seminary
in Vermont. Bishops used psychiatric
centers and psychiatrists when
behaviors, especially sexual activity
became a threat of scandal. The records
of the Diocese of Burlington show that
the bishops received one hundred and
forty-two (142) complaints or reports of
sexual misbehavior of its priests. The
earliest written report dates to 1953
when Edward Ryan was Bishop of
Burlington. The first record of priest
being sent to Via Coeli was 1954. In
1958 Bishop Joyce referred a sexually
active priest for psychiatric treatment
in Canada. Although the diocese noted a
large number of reports registered in
2002 (16 in the first six months of the
year) 10 of the 2002 reports had been
made previously, some repeatedly. In
some reports sexual activity began in
1940 and consistently the diocese was
privy to that activity in the 1950s and
1960s.
10. Treatment:
there are records that fourteen (14)
priests were sent for treatment to the
Paraclete Center of Via Coeli between
1956 and 1993; ten (10) priests were
sent to St. Luke’s Institute between
1978 and 1992; one (1) priest was sent
to a priest-psychiatrist in Canada in
1958 for a “homosexual” problem; two (2)
priests were sent to the Institute of
Living in 1977; two (2) priests were
sent, one in 1982 and one in 1990, to
Guest House a treatment center for
alcoholic priests. Various other
treatment centers are mentioned, St.
John Vianney in Pennsylvania, St.
Francis in New Jersey; retreats were
sometimes recommended after priests were
reported for sexual violations. There
are several notices of psychological or
psychiatric evaluations but the reports
and providers are not noted.
11. Disposition after
the report of abuse. Some priests were
received into service in the Burlington
Diocese after they were known to have
sexually abused minors previously in
other jurisdictions. Seven (7) priests
were suspended because of their
behavior. Another seven (7) priests
sought laicization from the priesthood
after sexual involvement with women. Two
(2) priests joined the military as
chaplains after they were reported for
abusing minor boys. Most of the
remaining priests were re-assigned to
pastoral duties either with or without
any indication of psychological
treatment. Twenty-nine (29) priests were
reported multiple times, i.e. a priest
reported for oral and anal sex with teen
boys in 1966 and 1970 was sent for
treatment only after he was reported a
third time in 1992. He was re-assigned
to pastoral duties in 1993. Alcoholism
was often the stated reason for sending
a sexually offending priest for
treatment, and indeed alcohol is
frequently a component of sexual
offences. But only two priests were sent
to an institution that treats only
alcoholic priests. Bishop Marshall noted
in 1983 that he was sending a priest to
St. Luke’s who was sent to Guest House
in 1975 because he had problems beyond
alcoholism. The priest in question was
the subject of a report in 1977 of sex
with a 14 year-old boy, and solicitation
of a minor in 1981. This man had been
dismissed from a seminary in 1965 and
yet was ordained for Burlington in 1973
after a report of suspicion for bad
moral conduct from a seminary in 1971.
He was finally suspended in 1990.
12. Pattern and Practice
of a Diocese: Although the written records
supplied do not reflect the total history of
sexual activity of priests in the Burlington
Diocese or the bishops’ complete knowledge
and awareness of celibate violations
including the sexual abuse of minors, what
is available is valuable. It is extremely
important for the prevention of sexual abuse
of minors by Roman Catholic clergy to
understand how diocesan and religious order
authorities received and responded to all
the complaints of sexual misbehavior. I have
frequently been summarily dismissed when I
have relayed reports of abuse to church
officials in other areas.
The documents of the Diocese
of Burlington reveal a history of neglect
and at times complete disregard for the
welfare of minors and others who were
sexually assaulted and abused by its clergy.
This history is no better or worse than
other dioceses or religious orders. It is
only one example. We can all learn and
profit from understanding the facts and the
pressures under which priests are asked to
serve their people.
The basic structure of
clerical culture and education still exists.
We will continue to analyze the data about
celibate performance and sexual abuse from
the official records already we have on hand
with the hope that knowledge will lead to
action.
The Visitation of United
States’ seminaries has not made any
difference in the education for celibacy of
clergy. The corruption of clerical life
comes from the top down. The attitudes,
atmospheres, and behaviors of superiors,
seminary faculties, chancery offices, and
bishops all contribute to the deterioration
of Christian ideals and behavior. There is
little evidence that these factors have
changed since 2002.
The actions of the bishops
and religious superiors in the United States
so far (2009) have largely been window
dressing. Lay Catholics, the likes of Frank
Keating former Governor of Oklahoma and
Chief Justice Anne Burke of Illinois, who
have been intimately involved in the public
efforts of the USCCB to deal with the
scandal, have declared as much. Image and
the avoidance of scandal are still the
motivating factors that drive church action.
In addition the sexual double life of a
certain number of highly placed clergy is
assiduously protected from public view at
any cost. Obedience and conformity are the
pillars of resistance to change. Fundamental
reform—real change in attitude and behavior
within the clerical culture—has yet to come.
Already 30 percent of men and women brought
up Catholic have walked away from the
Church—but not from Christ
Cf. also A Review of Abuse
from Church Files on this site under
Forensic |